I think i'm in love...

Keavy · Post by **Keavy** » Sat Oct 21, 2006 11:09 pm

Clicky*

*WARNING: What you are about to see is so hot it may melt your computer.

Sakino · Post by **Sakino** » Sat Oct 21, 2006 11:14 pm

I agree with "Chadwacker's" comment there.

Bitneko · Post by **Bitneko** » Sun Oct 22, 2006 12:59 am

Sakino wrote:I agree with "Chadwacker's" comment there.

/nod

Post by **Karou Ariyen** » Sun Oct 22, 2006 12:59 am

I'm gonna have to agree with chaddy

Keavy · Post by **Keavy** » Sun Oct 22, 2006 3:12 am

He is right, but those ladies will look good in my harem.

You gotta admit that.

Post by **Sugami** » Sun Oct 22, 2006 12:21 pm

Stupid pussycat dolls, aren't they burlesque dancers or something?

I don't see any difference between this drivvel and any other crap out there, lyrics don't mean a thing they're just trying to sell records and get rich(er) and being half-naked helps the cause.

I'll stick to Metallica thanks

\m/(>_<)\m/

(so much better live but still awesome

)

Rinni · Post by **Rinni** » Sun Oct 22, 2006 6:34 pm

i'll agree with sugami. i'll stick with rock.

it's sad but in todays society, but sex sells. what sickens me more, is when you see 10 year old girls dressed to imitate them, strutting about and singing along...

Gabryel · Post by **Gabryel** » Mon Oct 23, 2006 12:40 am

This just seems to me like a Victoria's Secret commercial in music video form >.>;

Keavy · Post by **Keavy** » Mon Oct 23, 2006 12:49 am

Gabryel wrote:This just seems to me like a Victoria's Secret commercial in music video form >.>;

Which is why I like it.

Also, their songs are kinda catchy.

Post by **Alya Mizar (Tsybil)** » Mon Oct 23, 2006 1:15 am

Gabryel wrote:This just seems to me like a Victoria's Secret commercial in music video form >.>;

I honestly don't see anything wrong with that.

But then again, I see nothing wrong with the highly public lingere adds on the streets in Europe either.

Post by **Sugami** » Mon Oct 23, 2006 12:18 pm

Lingere good!
Crappy pop bad!

But yeah turn the volume down and the video is quite good

Rinni wrote:it's sad but in todays society, but sex sells. what sickens me more, is when you see 10 year old girls dressed to imitate them, strutting about and singing along...

Dunno about the last bit but seeing all these tweenagers dressed up like prostitutes to try and look like adults is rather amusing and kinda ironic since it shows their immaturity a lot more

P.S. Metallica is F-ing METAL! \m/(>_<)\m/

Eviticus · Post by **Eviticus** » Mon Oct 23, 2006 3:54 pm

Today we have learned valuable lessons.

Pop: Bad
Metallica: F'ing Metal
Lingerie: Hell yeah
Metallica in Lingerie: wtf?

Rinni · Post by **Rinni** » Mon Oct 23, 2006 11:35 pm

EVI! stop being horny in the forums.

Genese · Post by **Genese** » Tue Oct 24, 2006 2:22 am

i wanna back hand anyone who likes that junk, songs terrible, repeats WAY too much, deathstars or sonata arctica are way better (and look better) and i agree with chad, they look like whores, rather bad ones at that. and 10 y.o in lingerie... whats wrong with poeple these days >< freakin loli pedos

Sakino · Post by **Sakino** » Tue Oct 24, 2006 6:36 am

Sugami wrote:P.S. Metallica is F-ing METAL! \m/(>_<)\m/

Was metal imho.

They are more gunge now. Their old stuff (Black CD etc) I consider metal.

Blind Guardians ftw!

Post by **Sugami** » Tue Oct 24, 2006 12:13 pm

Grunge my ass. Given St. Anger and the other more recent stuff pale in comparrison to Load and Reload but it's still heavy, thrash metal.

Okuza · Post by **Okuza** » Wed Oct 25, 2006 12:56 am

I kinda agree there. They're fit and trim, but to really be sexy they have to enjoy it. It's bad lip synch, bad posing, and bad acting with a heavy beat. They look like they're at a jazzercize class.

OTH, anyone have the number of the tall muscular one?

Eviticus · Post by **Eviticus** » Thu Oct 26, 2006 3:40 pm

Rinni wrote:EVI! stop being horny in the forums.

o.0 You think that was bad?

Genese wrote:...repeats WAY too much...

Hey, I like Techno, what about that?

Genese wrote:whats wrong with poeple these days >< freakin loli pedos

Pft, loli has more taste then that...generally...

Tinacat · Post by **Tinacat** » Thu Oct 26, 2006 4:29 pm

I'll stick to Metallica thanks

No thanks, I really cant get into Metallica, when it sounds like Elmer Fudd is the lead singer.

Post by **Sugami** » Thu Oct 26, 2006 5:06 pm

What?!

You dare diss The Het (James Hetfield)?! If you took awesome and shaped it into a man that's what you'd get, great guitar player and front man

Kistala · Post by **Kistala** » Thu Oct 26, 2006 7:24 pm

Huh. Am I the only one here who reads Chad's comment and sees 'idiot'?

My response to his post:

1)What they are saying is that they don't need men to get themselves off. It's called 'masturbation' and anyone who isn't a christian fundamentalist afraid of going blind can do it.
2) They do, however, want real, lasting, emotional/personal relationships. As opposed to one that's just about sex.
3)As for how they are dressed... quite simply, that's taunting every man who chases after women for nothig but sex. "You know you want this, but you ain't gettin' it. I don't need you."

Mind you, I'm no fan of pop music. Which this classifies as in my opinion. And I pulled all that from casually listening to the lyrics.

Post by **Sugami** » Fri Oct 27, 2006 12:30 pm

You listened to the lyrics? I kinda phased them out

Kistala · Post by **Kistala** » Sat Oct 28, 2006 11:58 am

Sugami wrote:You listened to the lyrics? I kinda phased them out

One of the reasons I prefer music without lyrics (like electronica) is that I cannot help but try to puzzle out the meaning and intent behind said lyrics, rather than focusing on the music itself.