thx

meow
The P4 Extreme Edition has 2MB of Level 3 Cache added. It jacks up the price significantly, but can also provide a reasonable speed boost under certain cases. It's a bit difficult to quantify the effect that such a cache has, since if the CPU is routinely working with a block of memory larger than 128KB, yet smaller than 2MB, it's a huge win. Otherwise, the performance about the same as a standard P4. I tried looking for FFXI Benchmark-specific numbers, but although I found some Japanese pages, none of them compared non-EE. But there are benchmarks that compare other applications, benchmarks, and games, so I'd suggest you do some searches to see if the performance boost is worth it.Toren wrote:1)difference in the P4 and P4 extreme
Serial ATA is the wave of the future, but that future is still a bit slow in coming. Serial ATA eliminates the bulky ribbon cables and master/slave issues of EIDE-style "Parallel ATA" (or PATA) and replaces them with narrow wires which are capable of better throughput, can be longer to help reach devices, can be safely hot-swappable (removable with the power on) if the OS supports it, has a strict 1-to-1 connection between the motherboard and device, and which most BIOS can transparently make look like classic IDE controllers to the OS, thus requiring no new drivers. You can get adaptors to make HDs with PATA connectors work with SATA. I did this in my own system, since SATA drives of sufficient size to meet my needs weren't yet available, but I wanted the better cable reach and airflow SATA provided. However, it's good if the motherboard has PATA on it too to be safe (and most ones during this adoption period will), since I noticed my DVD drive didn't like being connected via one of those adaptors and I ended up eventually just wiring it with a PATA cable. In short, SATA will allow you to use a few current drives and others in the future which run faster than PATA ones, and which are much easier to wire and maintain, but until then, you may find yourself not using that capability, or simply using adaptors to take advantage of the cables without gaining any speed.Toren wrote:2)diffrence in serial ata and eide, should i opt for the serial ata
Depends on what you keep open at once. I have 1GB and am comfortable with that unless I start doing heavy photo-editing of large images. If you routinely work with multi-GB files, you know who you are, and can plan accordingly. Otherwise, I think 1GB should suffice for many years for the average consumer. (Unless of course, another 1GB of RAM is really cheap, in which case, you may want to splurge even on the rare chance that you might develop an interest in professional high-res photo editing.)Toren wrote:3)will i see a big difference in 1 gig memory and 2 gig?
I only have 512 MB of dual channeled* DDR (400) RAM. The only time I've come within 100 MB of it was when I had two 1200 dpi PSD's open at once. I really doubt you'll see any difference.Toren wrote:3)will i see a big difference in 1 gig memory and 2 gig?
Unless specifically stated, Dell will do what you tell them to do.Syine wrote:Oh, and a warning that Dell may not give you: Intel 875/865-based motherboards operate best with RAM DIMMs in pairs. If you only have one stick of RAM, you're effectively halving your memory throughput and crippling performance. So whatever you get, make sure it's divided evenly between an even number of sticks.