Friend of mine uses that image for her alla accountPsymia wrote:http://web.green.ch/psychonator/ffxi_1_1024.jpg
Isn't porn a form of art?Kailea wrote:This is nice art....but I find it a bit taistless, there is porn and clean art.....but when they have things like this that is boarderline porn -.- I find it a bit taistless, but other then that they are very well drawn pictures ^.^
I am a bit odd when it comes to things like this... I love porn...and I love good art, but sometimes I get picky :p
). Still, that RDM is about the best portrayal of any Elvaan I've seen. They made her manage to look adorably cute. The RNG is uber-cute tho, cuz she's Mithra. ^^
Who knew slackers could work so hard? D:
Thank youNekiu wrote:http://img519.imageshack.us/img519/8936/akwallx2xc.jpg
http://img519.imageshack.us/img519/479/awall1qi.jpg
Admin Edit: Lets not display NWS images directly on the boards.
Who knew slackers could work so hard? D: Umm... no porn is porn. Erotic art is artNeoshinobi wrote:Isn't porn a form of art?
There is a difference if but a very small one.
Who knew slackers could work so hard? D: 
this artist is pretty awesome...)
Its all art. The difference between Porn and erotic art is in the eye of the beholder. Some "Christians" think anything with nudity is Porn, like Michealangleo's David or Playboy. There is no hard dividing line, like the feather or the whole chicken, or our courts would have built laws around it.Sugami wrote:Umm... no porn is porn. Erotic art is artNeoshinobi wrote:Isn't porn a form of art?
Sugami wrote:That Elvaan has to be female as male pants don't show skin but she has pretty broad shoulders.
the DRG pic in the manual is of an Elvaan, the Fomor DRG is a Hume err... *shrug* I disagree, the difference is in the intention of the "artist" (I use the term broadly). Where erotic art is meant to be viewed in an art gallery for people to "admire the brush strokes" porn is meant to be viewed in someone's room for the purpose of a "quick one off the wrist".Tsybil wrote:Its all art. The difference between Porn and erotic art is in the eye of the beholder. Some "Christians" think anything with nudity is Porn, like Michealangleo's David or Playboy. There is no hard dividing line, like the feather or the whole chicken, or our courts would have built laws around it.
hehe Intent of the artist has to be the hardest thing to prove in court. And it HAS been tried.Sugami wrote:I disagree, the difference is in the intention of the "artist" (I use the term broadly). Where erotic art is meant to be viewed in an art gallery for people to "admire the brush strokes" porn is meant to be viewed in someone's room for the purpose of a "quick one off the wrist".Tsybil wrote:Its all art. The difference between Porn and erotic art is in the eye of the beholder.... There is no hard dividing line, like the feather or the whole chicken, or our courts would have built laws around it.
Porn makers will still call themselves "artists" though but that's only to make themselves feel better about what they do
I am serious here, look up the history of a little peice known as "September Morn".Hmm...in FFXI story, King Ranparre is a DRGEviticus wrote:Why does it have to be an Elvaan Drg. >.>; Why not Mithra?
So, no wonder an Elvaan are often subject to be a DRG. Yes but intent of the "viewer" may not have anything to do with what the artist intended. I'm sure Michaelangelo would have been pissed if he saw someone jerking off to his DavidTsybil wrote:Intent of the artist has to be the hardest thing to prove in court. And it HAS been tried.
There is viewer's intent too. Do you think no one has gotten a "quick one off the wrist" to the Mona Lisa? David? Heck, there are probably pervos who think Picasso's "Nude Decending a Staircase" is porn.
And then there is the publicist's intent.
).
Ya...I guess I've misinterpreted on this...Eviticus wrote:I think actually Ranparre was the Dragon King, and he had a special order of Dragon Knights directly under his command. He himself was no dragoon, if I am remembering right.
